Search

or browse through some categories...

Entries in the ' chimpanzees ' category

The annual Human Behavior and Evolution Society meeting is on next week in Kyoto, Japan. Anyone going? Looks like there’s going to be a lot of interesting primatology talks…

Continue Reading »

Back in the 1970s, a chimpanzee named Nim Chimpsky took part in a Columbia University research study called “Project Nim.”
Project Nim was led by Herbert Terrace, a psychologist at Columbia who was attempting to find out if a chimpanzee could learn to communicate using American Sign Language.
“Everyone knows that words are learned one at [...]

Continue Reading »

Written May 8, 2008 in chimpanzees, people, primates

Over at the Freakonomics blog, the primatologist Frans de Waal answers readers questions on …how polygamist sects mimic the mating systems of animals, and why bonobos eat after sex, amongst other things.

Continue Reading »

“Raised like a son by a New York City family as part of a language experiment, Nim Chimpsky was shipped away when funds ran out. A new biography tells Nim’s story.“

Continue Reading »

This week in Science - The inappropriate use and protrayal of Chimpanzees:
In 2005, a survey (see the table, left side) was conducted at the Regenstein Center for African Apes (RCAA) at the Lincoln Park Zoo (Chicago, IL). (…) The final question of the survey asked respondents to select which of three great ape species (chimpanzees, [...]

Continue Reading »

Dear Zoo Visitor:
Sorry to hear about your disappointment during your visit, but, yes, “sexual” behavior is normal for bonobos in the wild, including juveniles. In fact, most behaviors, obviously all those involving juveniles, that involve two or more bonobos in “sexual” activity are not really sexual in the sense of procreation, rather they are [...]

Continue Reading »

#

Do chimps have culture? a phylogenetic study

Over the last few years, the evidence has been accumulating that different populations of chimpanzees have different cultures. Field studies of chimp behaviors (e.g. Whiten et al 1999 (PDF)) have shown a wide range of behavioral variation across Africa.

For example, chimps at one site, Bossou, use stone hammers and anvils to open nuts, whilst at another site, the chimps use both wooden and stone hammers on anvils made of stone and root. More examples, from White et al, show some of the variation in types of behavior and how they differ across research sites:

sites
Behavior Bossou, Guinea Taı̈ Forest, Ivory Coast Gombe, Tanzania Mahale (M-Group), Tanzania Mahale (K-Group), Tanzania Kibale Forest, Uganda Budongo Forest, Uganda
Investigatory probe (probe and sniff) Habitual Customary Customary Habitual Habitual Present Absent
Drag branch (drag large branch in display) Habitual Customary Customary Customary Customary Habitual Habitual
Leaf-sponge (leaf mass used as sponge) Customary Customary Customary Present Absent Customary Customary
Branch-clasp (clasp branch above, groom) Habitual Customary Customary Customary Customary Customary Customary
Branch-shake (to attract attention, court) Customary Customary Customary Customary Customary Habitual Customary
Buttress-beat (drum on buttress of tree) Customary Customary Customary Customary Customary Customary Customary
Rain dance (slow display at start of rain) Absent Habitual Customary Customary Customary Customary Habitual

It has been suggested that this type of variation is representative of cultural traditions, and hints at a new field of study: cultural panthropology. However, not everyone is convinced that this is evidence of chimpanzee culture. This could just be the outcome of genetic differences between the populations.

To test this, Lycett et al, forthcoming in P.N.A.S., take the Whiten et al data, and analyse it within a phylogenetic framework (parsimony). This gave them a tree showing the cultural relatedness of these groups. If this behavioral variation is due to genetics, then this tree should conform to the groupings found in previous genetic analyses.

This is not the case - the behavioral data does not mirror the genetic data. Lycett et al conclude that:

These findings are inconsistent with the hypothesis that patterns of behavioral differences at the population level are genetically determined. Instead, they are in line with a growing number of studies involving captive groups (…) and wild populations (…) that suggest many chimpanzee behaviors are socially learned and can be considered cultural.

Reference:
Lycett et al: Phylogenetic analyses of behavior support existence of culture among wild chimpanzees

( 0 )