Search

or browse through some categories...

Entries written in January 2007

Written January 31, 2007 in evolution, non-human, psychology

Sol et al in Proceedings of the Royal Society:
Big brains are hypothesized to enhance survival of animals by facilitating flexible cognitive responses that buffer individuals against environmental stresses. Although this theory receives partial support from the finding that brain size limits the capacity of animals to behaviourally respond to environmental challenges, the hypothesis that large [...]

Continue Reading »

Written January 30, 2007 in anthropology, evolution

Homo floriensis (the “Hobbit”), may be a distinct species after all, and not a microcephalic infant. More

Continue Reading »

Written January 30, 2007 in psychology

John Tierney in the New York Times Science Blog:

So these five hundred social psychologists walk into a ballroom. They sit through a symposium entitled Cognitive Dissonance Theory Celebrates 50th Birthday. Afterwards there is birthday cake for everyone – two birthday cakes, actually. One is chocolate; one’s white. Neither looks particularly better than the other.

Suppose you’re [...]

Continue Reading »

#

A. Dawn Shaikh in Usability News:

Participants were shown the email document in one of three fonts (Calibri, Comic Sans, or Gigi) (…) The participants were instructed to read the document carefully and then fill out a paper-based survey when finished reading (…)

The appropriateness of the typeface also affected the perception of the email author in that the email using Gigi created a perception of an author who is less professional, less trustworthy, and less mature. Finally, the typeface that was lower in appropriateness led participants to conclude that the author was a lower level trainee employee. When choosing a typeface for a document, the level of appropriateness should be taken into account in order to avoid sending unintentional messages.

Continue reading The Effect of Typeface on the Perception of Email

( 0 )

#

Nature’s reporting that some science publishers have hired Eric Dezenhall (who did PR for Enron among others) to fight the new Open Science movement:

the consultant advised them to focus on simple messages, such as ”Public access equals government censorship”. He hinted that the publishers should attempt to equate traditional publishing models with peer review, and “paint a picture of what the world would look like without peer-reviewed articles”.

Read more about the pathetic dying throes of a parasitic industry and then go support PLOS, whilst pondering the irony of Nature complaining about this.

( 0 )

Written January 25, 2007 in anthropology, linguistics, psychology

Grue is my favorite color, but one of the big debates in linguistics concerns color perception. The two major viewpoints are either that colors are defined purely by culture but this viewpoint tends to lead to all sorts of sillyness .The opposing view is that colors are perceived the same everywhere, but we just label [...]

Continue Reading »