Language and scientific publication
Q: Dear Nature, if the quality of writing helps someone get published, is this fair for non-native English speakers? Read the interesting debate on “Ask the Nature Editor”
Editor Henry Gee continues the discussion on his blog:
…scientists in some disciplines keep their papers inaccessible on purpose, as they are less reports of great discoveries than placeholders in the never-ending battle between competing research groups. The relationships that such authors have with journals is congruent with that between dogs and lamp-posts. The urinous signal is meaningful to other dogs, if not to cats or horses. But it’s the same old lamp-post that gets peed on.
Huh, the urinated-upon-lamp-post theory of scientific publishing?
Posted on
October 10th, 2007 by
Simon Greenhill
Leave a Reply
Categories
- africa
- americas
- anthropology
- art
- austronesian
- bacteria
- bees
- birds
- bongo-bongoism
- books
- chimpanzees
- conferences
- creationism-is-stupid
- cultural evolution
- culture
- dinosaurs
- disease
- europe
- evolution
- Evolutionary Psychology
- fossils
- genetics
- henry
- horizontal gene transfer
- human prehistory
- humor
- it-was-better-in-my-day
- language
- language preservation
- linguistics
- literature
- microsatellites
- misc
- mtDNA
- music
- neanderthals
- neuroscience
- new-caledonian-crows
- non-human
- ook!
- orangutans
- papers-I-should-read
- people
- phylogenetics
- polynesia
- primates
- psychology
- punctuated equilibrium
- quotes
- religion
- science
- self-improvement
- sexual selection
- six-degrees
- software
- SSTA
- stupidity
- tool-use
- Tree Tuesday
- Uncategorized
- websites
- wednesday-wiki
- Y chromosome
Related Sites
- Anthropology.net
- bayblab
- Computational Biology and Evolution
- Culture evolves!
- Dechronization
- Expelled
- Genomicron
- iPhylo
- John Hawks
- language.psy.auckland.ac.nz
- Of Two Minds
- Primatology.net
- Quentin Atkinson
- simon.net.nz
