Petition to reclassify “intelligent design” books
Intelligent Design is not science, and shouldn’t be classified in the evolution section. Go and sign the petition to fix that here.
I noticed that there were a lot of these intelligent design books in the evolution section,” says Shaw, who’s researching the evolution of sloths, anteaters, and armadillos as she works on her Ph.D. “I took one of each, and it was about a three-foot stack. I thought, this is wrong.“
Posted on 
November 4th, 2007 by 
Simon Greenhill
2 Responses to “Petition to reclassify “intelligent design” books”
Leave a Reply
Categories
- africa
- americas
- anthropology
- art
- austronesian
- bacteria
- bees
- birds
- bongo-bongoism
- books
- chimpanzees
- conferences
- creationism-is-stupid
- cultural evolution
- culture
- dinosaurs
- disease
- europe
- evolution
- Evolutionary Psychology
- fossils
- genetics
- henry
- horizontal gene transfer
- human prehistory
- humor
- it-was-better-in-my-day
- language
- language preservation
- linguistics
- literature
- microsatellites
- misc
- mtDNA
- music
- neanderthals
- neuroscience
- new-caledonian-crows
- non-human
- ook!
- orangutans
- papers-I-should-read
- people
- phylogenetics
- polynesia
- primates
- psychology
- punctuated equilibrium
- quotes
- religion
- science
- self-improvement
- sexual selection
- six-degrees
- software
- SSTA
- stupidity
- tool-use
- Tree Tuesday
- Uncategorized
- websites
- wednesday-wiki
- Y chromosome
Related Sites
- Anthropology.net
- bayblab
- Computational Biology and Evolution
- Culture evolves!
- Dechronization
- Expelled
- Genomicron
- iPhylo
- John Hawks
- language.psy.auckland.ac.nz
- Of Two Minds
- Primatology.net
- Quentin Atkinson
- simon.net.nz
Email Henry Updates to Me
November 4th, 2007 at 2:08 pm
Ineligent Design is NOT Science. These books should be in the Religion section and no polluting the Science section. Anything else and you are giving peple the wrong impression of what Science is. MOVE THE ID BOOKS!
November 4th, 2007 at 2:25 pm
Richard - I totally agree!
–Simon