Stamping his mark - on the bacterial genome
Andrew Pollack in the NYTimes reveals the secret message implanted in the recently announced synthetic bacterial genome.
You were expecting poetry perhaps? The secret messages hidden in scientist J. Craig Venter’s synthetic bacterial genome have now been revealed. They are — his name, and that of his research institute and co-workers.
I can’t decide whether this is kinda cute, kinda arrogant, or totally cool in a yay-for-hubris sort of way. Answers on the back of a postcard, please.
Posted on 
January 29th, 2008 by 
Simon Greenhill
8 Responses to “Stamping his mark - on the bacterial genome”
Leave a Reply
Categories
- africa
- americas
- anthropology
- art
- austronesian
- bacteria
- bees
- birds
- bongo-bongoism
- books
- chimpanzees
- conferences
- creationism-is-stupid
- cultural evolution
- culture
- dinosaurs
- disease
- europe
- evolution
- Evolutionary Psychology
- fossils
- genetics
- henry
- horizontal gene transfer
- human prehistory
- humor
- it-was-better-in-my-day
- language
- language preservation
- linguistics
- literature
- microsatellites
- misc
- mtDNA
- music
- neanderthals
- neuroscience
- new-caledonian-crows
- non-human
- ook!
- orangutans
- papers-I-should-read
- people
- phylogenetics
- polynesia
- primates
- psychology
- punctuated equilibrium
- quotes
- religion
- science
- self-improvement
- sexual selection
- six-degrees
- software
- SSTA
- stupidity
- tool-use
- Tree Tuesday
- Uncategorized
- websites
- wednesday-wiki
- Y chromosome
Related Sites
- Anthropology.net
- bayblab
- Computational Biology and Evolution
- Culture evolves!
- Dechronization
- Expelled
- Genomicron
- iPhylo
- John Hawks
- language.psy.auckland.ac.nz
- Of Two Minds
- Primatology.net
- Quentin Atkinson
- simon.net.nz
Email Henry Updates to Me
January 30th, 2008 at 5:33 am
I can’t decide whether this is kinda cute, kinda arrogant, or totally cool in a yay-for-hubris sort of way.
I vote for “totally cool in a yay-for-hubris sort of way”. Science needs one, and only one, Craig Venter.
January 30th, 2008 at 5:55 am
Yay for hubris. I’d have at least put my name in there if I did it, along with something cool.
January 30th, 2008 at 6:14 am
Not very original. I slipped a secret message into Michael Crichton’s sequel to Jurassic Park in 1995 which was detected and written about by a number of people. See
http://books.google.com/books?id=aIhu14SUsNIC&pg=PA84&lpg=PA84&dq=%22mark+was+here+nih%22&source=web&ots=tY1oUlZ-F0&sig=xsS4t1-edaKf-yLH89zpglCrATc
This example has also been used in various bioinformatics curricula and problem sets. See
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Class/FieldGuide/problem_set.html
The whole thing was inspired by my detection of Crichton’s forged dinosaur sequence in 1990.
See
http://www.markboguski.net/publications_PDFs/BioTechniques%201992.pdf
January 30th, 2008 at 1:42 pm
Elvis got there first!
http://virology.wisc.edu/acp/Classes/DropFolders/DropBioMod_lectures/M04-Elvis.pdf
January 31st, 2008 at 8:22 pm
Thanks for the comments, guys!
Mark: those links are awesome - very very cool, thanks :)
Kevin: I suspect the gene-jocks have *way* too much fun coming up with cute gene names that make funny reading!
–Simon
February 1st, 2008 at 12:40 am
When I published my “book report,” I sent Michael Crichton a reprint and I got an amusing letter back from him. I’ll try to find it and post a scan. The late Stephen J. Gould even commented on it. Again, I’ll try to find his correspondence and post it for you. -MB
February 1st, 2008 at 3:02 am
Links to Crichton’s and Gould’s reactions:
http://www.markboguski.net/publications_PDFs/Crichton%20letter.pdf
http://www.markboguski.net/publications_PDFs/Gould%20letter.pdf
February 7th, 2008 at 12:11 am
Mark, thanks for sharing those letters. I loved the Crichton anecdote - it’s great to see someone taking accuracy seriously! (& I’m a huge fan of Gould too)
–Simon